
Core i9-10940X

Xeon W-3323
Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-3323 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10940X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($784 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.3 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,684 vs 27,822).
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10940X better than Xeon W-3323?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10940X
The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-10940X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10940X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-3323. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total)+7% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,684 | 27,822 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10940X was priced at $784, while the Xeon W-3323 came in at $949. On launch pricing ($784 vs $949), Core i9-10940X was $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10940X delivers 35.3 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Core i9-10940X the 18.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $784-17% | $949 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.3+20% | 29.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















