Core i9-10940X vs EPYC 7401P

Core i9-10940X vs EPYC 7401P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10940X

14 / 28

27,684

0.0%

27,836

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10940X vs EPYC 7401P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10940X vs EPYC 7401P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10940X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,684 vs 27,836).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $784 MSRP, while EPYC 7401P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7401P

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
✅Draws 155W instead of 165W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10940X better than EPYC 7401P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7401P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-10940X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7401P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10940X is the better buy right now. Core i9-10940X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $784 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7401P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10940X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10940X vs EPYC 7401P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10940X

The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7401P

The EPYC 7401P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,836 points. Launch price was $1,075.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7401P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7401P has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401P — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10940X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7401P uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the EPYC 7401P's 27,836 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7401P. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401P.

Feature	Core i9-10940X	EPYC 7401P
Cores / Threads	14 / 28	24 / 48+71%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+60%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	19.25 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+232%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Cascade Lake-X (2019)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	27,684	27,836
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7401P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.