Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M

Intel

Xeon Gold 6210U

20 Cores40 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3245M

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6210U

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…+2.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • βœ…+25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 19,000).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 28 MB).
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6210U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6210U better than Xeon W-3245M?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3245M is ahead with a 20.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6210U pulls ahead with 2.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon Gold 6210U also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6210U is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6210U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3245M is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6210U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $5,002 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon W-3245M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3245M is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6210U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6210U

The Xeon Gold 6210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,861 points. Launch price was $1,500.

Intel

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚑

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6210U packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads β€” the Xeon Gold 6210U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6210U versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M β€” a 16.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6210U scores 28,861 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 β€” a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6210U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,000 vs 18,500 (2.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U). Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 1,234 vs 1,474, a 17.7% lead for the Xeon W-3245M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,072 vs 11,572 (13.9% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6210U vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

FeatureXeon Gold 6210UXeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+25%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
27.5 MB+25%
22 MB
L2 Cache
20 MB+25%
16 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020)
Cascade Lake (2019βˆ’2020)
PassMark
28,861+1%
28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,000+3%
18,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,234
1,474+19%
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,072
11,572+15%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6210U) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) β€” the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6210U) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

FeatureXeon Gold 6210UXeon W-3245M
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
2048 GB+100%
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
64+33%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6210U targets High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6210U rivals EPYC 7352; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

FeatureXeon Gold 6210UXeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute
Professional Workstation / Mac Pro