
Xeon Gold 6210U

Xeon W-3245M
Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6210U
2019Why buy it
- β +2.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
- β Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon W-3245M
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 19,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 28 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6210U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6210U better than Xeon W-3245M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6210U vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6210U
The Xeon Gold 6210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,861 points. Launch price was $1,500.

Xeon W-3245M
The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6210U packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Xeon Gold 6210U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6210U versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M β a 16.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019β2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6210U scores 28,861 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 β a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6210U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,000 vs 18,500 (2.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,234 vs 1,474, a 17.7% lead for the Xeon W-3245M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,072 vs 11,572 (13.9% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6210U vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6210U | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+25% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+25% | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) | Cascade Lake (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 28,861+1% | 28,494 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000+3% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,234 | 1,474+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,072 | 11,572+15% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6210U) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) β the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6210U) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6210U | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 2048 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6210U targets High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6210U rivals EPYC 7352; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6210U | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute | Professional Workstation / Mac Pro |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














