Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6210U

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6210U Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

8 / 16

29,088

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon Gold 6210U

20 / 40

28,861

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6210U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6210U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6210U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 19,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6210U, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6210U

2019

Why buy it

✅+19.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Xeon Gold 6210U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6210U makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6210U is the stronger fit. You are getting 19.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 33.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6210U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6210U

The Xeon Gold 6210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,861 points. Launch price was $1,500.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6210U offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6210U has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6210U — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6210U uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Xeon Gold 6210U's 28,861 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,930 vs 19,000 (17.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,332 vs 1,234, a 61.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,037 vs 10,072 (9.1% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6210U.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon Gold 6210U
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+31%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+52%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	27.5 MB+72%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,088	28,861
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,930	19,000+19%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,332+89%	1,234
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,037+10%	10,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6210U uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6210U — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6210U supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6210U). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6210U) — the Xeon Gold 6210U offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6210U).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon Gold 6210U
Socket	FP7	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6210U). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6210U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop, Xeon Gold 6210U targets High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Gold 6210U rivals EPYC 7352.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon Gold 6210U
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Enterprise Performance Laptop	High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute