
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Xeon Gold 6238
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6238 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6238 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6238: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6238 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,088 vs 29,118).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6238, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6238
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+89.1% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Xeon Gold 6238?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Gold 6238 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6238
The Xeon Gold 6238 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,118 points. Launch price was $2,612.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6238 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6238 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Xeon Gold 6238's 29,118 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6238. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 22 / 44+175% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+38% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30.25 MB+89% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 22 MB+2100% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,088 | 29,118 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,930 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,332 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,037 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6238 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6238 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6238). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6238) — the Xeon Gold 6238 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6238).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+91% | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1024 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6238). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6238 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Gold 6238 rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS | Xeon Gold 6238 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












