Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

8 / 16

29,088

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon Platinum 8160

24 / 48

28,989

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Platinum 8160 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8160

2017

Why buy it

✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,989 vs 29,088).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Xeon Platinum 8160?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8160 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 31.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 31.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+81%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	33 MB+106%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	29,088	28,989
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,930	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,332	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,037	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS	Xeon Platinum 8160
Socket	FP7	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+110%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	768 GB+200%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.