Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018
Threadripper family
··

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 21,444).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

2018

Why buy it

  • +34.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $899 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the stronger fit. You are getting 34.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $899 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 34.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 29,088 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,930 vs 21,444 (29.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,332 vs 1,255, a 60.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,037 vs 8,814 (22.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 8845HSRyzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+16%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+9%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
32 MB+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
4 nm-67%
12 nm
Architecture
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
29,088
29,462+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,930
21,444+35%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,332+86%
1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,037+25%
8,814
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 8845HSRyzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket
FP7
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+91%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
64+220%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

FeatureRyzen 7 PRO 8845HSRyzen Threadripper 2950X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
AMD-V
Target Use
Enterprise Performance Laptop