
Xeon Gold 6246R vs Core i5-12400F

Xeon Gold 6246R

Core i5-12400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6246R
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6246R | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($110) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6246R | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($110) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6246R and Core i5-12400F

Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6246R packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon Gold 6246R has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6246R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6246R scores 30,468 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 43.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,000 vs 12,380 (25.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,293 vs 1,700, a 27.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,848 vs 657 (175% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6246R | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB+99% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1180% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 30,468+56% | 19,532 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,000+29% | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,293 | 1,700+31% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,848+1399% | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6246R uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6246R versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6246R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6246R | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+140% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6246R | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-frequency Server / Financial | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















