
Xeon Gold 6250

Xeon W-2150B
Xeon Gold 6250 vs Xeon W-2150B Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6250 vs Xeon W-2150B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6250 vs Xeon W-2150B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6250
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+160% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 14 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 41.1 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌54.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 120W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-2150B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,901 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 579.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.1 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 185W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,486 vs 20,552).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 36 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6250 better than Xeon W-2150B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6250 vs Xeon W-2150B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6250
The Xeon Gold 6250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,552 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-2150B
The Xeon W-2150B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,486 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6250 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2150B offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-2150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6250 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2150B — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W-2150B is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6250 scores 20,552 against the Xeon W-2150B's 20,486 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6250. L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6250 vs 13.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2150B.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6250 | Xeon W-2150B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+30% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB+160% | 13.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 20,552 | 20,486 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,463 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,410 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,324 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6250 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2150B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6250 | Xeon W-2150B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 512 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 6250) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2150B).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6250 | Xeon W-2150B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 6250 was priced at $3400, while the Xeon W-2150B came in at $499. On launch pricing ($3400 vs $499), Xeon W-2150B was $2901 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6250 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 41.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2150B — making the Xeon W-2150B the 148.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6250 | Xeon W-2150B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3400 | $499-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 41.1+585% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














