Xeon Gold 6314U vs EPYC Embedded 8224P
Xeon Gold 6314U
EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6314U
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6314U | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,977) | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6314U | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+184%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,977) | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6314U and EPYC Embedded 8224P
Xeon Gold 6314U
The Xeon Gold 6314U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,916 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6314U packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6314U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6314U versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6314U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6314U uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6314U scores 48,916 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6314U. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6314U vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6314U | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.55 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 48,916 | 48,869 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6314U uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6314U versus 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — the EPYC Embedded 8224P supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6314U supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 6314U) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 128 (Xeon Gold 6314U) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the Xeon Gold 6314U offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Gold 6314U) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6314U | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+256% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6314U) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6314U rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6314U | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6314U launched at $2977 MSRP, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P debuted at $855.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6314U | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2977 | $855-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1048 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 6314U and EPYC Embedded 8224P
