Xeon Gold 6348H vs Microsoft SQ1
Xeon Gold 6348H
Microsoft SQ1
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Gold 6348H is positioned at rank 483 and the Microsoft SQ1 is on rank 877, so the Xeon Gold 6348H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6348H
Performance Per Dollar Microsoft SQ1
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6348H | Microsoft SQ1 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cooper Lake-SP (2021) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Gold 6348H | Microsoft SQ1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6348H and Microsoft SQ1
Xeon Gold 6348H
The Xeon Gold 6348H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 5,967 points. Launch price was $800.
Microsoft SQ1
The Microsoft SQ1 is manufactured by Microsoft. It was released in 2 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 6,039 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6348H packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Microsoft SQ1 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348H has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348H versus 3 GHz on the Microsoft SQ1 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6348H. The Xeon Gold 6348H uses the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Microsoft SQ1 uses Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6348H scores 5,967 against the Microsoft SQ1's 6,039 — a 1.2% lead for the Microsoft SQ1. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348H vs 2 MB on the Microsoft SQ1.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6348H | Microsoft SQ1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total)+1550% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| PassMark | 5,967 | 6,039+1% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 6348H and Microsoft SQ1
