Xeon Gold 6421N vs Xeon W-3375

Intel

Xeon Gold 6421N

32 Cores64 Thrd185 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3375

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Xeon Gold 6421N vs Xeon W-3375 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6421N vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6421N vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6421N

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $2,583 less on MSRP ($2,368 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 108.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 185W instead of 270W, a 85W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
  • βœ…25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 59,091).

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
    • ❌45.9% higher power demand at 270W vs 185W.
    • ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6421N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon W-3375 better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
    Yes. Xeon W-3375 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3375 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon W-3375 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6421N is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3375 comes in 109.1% more expensive on MSRP at $4,951 MSRP versus $2,368 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6421N is also 108.0% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon Gold 6421N makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    Xeon Gold 6421N vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Xeon Gold 6421N

    The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.

    Intel

    Xeon W-3375

    The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Xeon Gold 6421N packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads β€” the Xeon W-3375 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 β€” a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3375 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6421N uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6421N scores 58,797 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 β€” a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-3375. L3 cache: 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6421N vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

    FeatureXeon Gold 6421NXeon W-3375
    Cores / Threads
    32 / 64
    38 / 76+19%
    Boost Clock
    3.6 GHz
    4 GHz+11%
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2.5 GHz+39%
    L3 Cache
    60 MB+5%
    57 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    Intel 7 nm-30%
    10 nm
    Architecture
    Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024)
    Ice Lake-W (2021)
    PassMark
    58,797
    59,091
    Geekbench 6 Single
    β€”
    1,818
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    β€”
    17,713
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon Gold 6421N uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6421N versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 β€” the Xeon Gold 6421N supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 6421N) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) β€” the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

    FeatureXeon Gold 6421NXeon W-3375
    Socket
    LGA4677
    LGA4189
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    4800+50%
    DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    4096 GB
    4096 GB
    RAM Channels
    8
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    80+25%
    64
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6421N) vs true (Xeon W-3375). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

    FeatureXeon Gold 6421NXeon W-3375
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    true
    πŸ’°

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Xeon Gold 6421N was priced at $2368, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($2368 vs $4951), Xeon Gold 6421N was $2583 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6421N delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 β€” making the Xeon Gold 6421N the 70.1% better value option.

    FeatureXeon Gold 6421NXeon W-3375
    MSRP
    $2368-52%
    $4951
    Performance per Dollar
    24.8+108%
    11.9
    Release Date
    2023
    2021

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.