
EPYC 7473X

Xeon Gold 6421N
EPYC 7473X vs Xeon Gold 6421N Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7473X vs Xeon Gold 6421N FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7473X vs Xeon Gold 6421N: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7473X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ❌29.7% higher power demand at 240W vs 185W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6421N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,532 less on MSRP ($2,368 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 240W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7473X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 59,280).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7473X better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7473X vs Xeon Gold 6421N Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7473X
The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.

Xeon Gold 6421N
The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7473X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6421N has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N — a 2.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 7473X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 7473X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7473X scores 59,280 against the Xeon Gold 6421N's 58,797 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6421N.
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+56% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1180% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 59,280 | 58,797 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7473X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7473X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6421N — the Xeon Gold 6421N supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7473X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6421N) — the EPYC 7473X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7473X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N).
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6421N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7473X was priced at $3900, while the Xeon Gold 6421N came in at $2368. On launch pricing ($3900 vs $2368), Xeon Gold 6421N was $1532 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7473X delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6421N — making the Xeon Gold 6421N the 48.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3900 | $2368-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 24.8+63% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















