EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7473X

AMD

EPYC 74F3

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7473X

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7473X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7473X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7473X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 74F3

2021

Why buy it

  • +2.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $2,987 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
  • Delivers 337.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7473X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 768 MB).

EPYC 7473X

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (59,280 vs 60,666).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 74F3 better than EPYC 7473X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7473X is ahead with a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 74F3 pulls ahead with 2.3% better PassMark. EPYC 7473X also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 74F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 74F3 is the better buy right now. EPYC 74F3 comes in $2,987 cheaper on MSRP at $913 MSRP versus $3,900 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 7473X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 337.2% better value on MSRP (66.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7473X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and 200% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 256 MB). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 7473X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 74F3

The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

AMD

EPYC 7473X

The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 74F3 and EPYC 7473X share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X — a 7.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 74F3 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7473X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the EPYC 7473X's 59,280 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 74F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X.

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7473X
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 48
Boost Clock
4 GHz+8%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)
768 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Milan-X (2022)
PassMark
60,666+2%
59,280
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP3 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and SP3 (EPYC 7473X).

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7473X
Socket
SP3
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7473X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the EPYC 7473X came in at $3900. On launch pricing ($913 vs $3900), EPYC 74F3 was $2987 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7473X — making the EPYC 74F3 the 125.5% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 74F3EPYC 7473X
MSRP
$913-77%
$3900
Performance per Dollar
66.4+337%
15.2
Release Date
2021
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.