EPYC 74F3
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 74F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Costs $424 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 280W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,666 vs 62,261).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ❌16.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 240W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX better than EPYC 74F3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 74F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 74F3
The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 2.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 60,666 | 62,261+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,211 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 74F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 74F3) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX came in at $1337. On launch pricing ($913 vs $1337), EPYC 74F3 was $424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the EPYC 74F3 the 35.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913-32% | $1337 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.4+42% | 46.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
