EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8454H

CPU

GPU

EPYC 74F3

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8454H

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Performance Spectrum

EPYC 74F3

24 / 48

60,666

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5900

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8454H

32 / 64

62,347

+2.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8454H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8454H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 74F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 256 MB vs 83 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Costs $5,627 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
✅Delivers 597.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
✅Draws 240W instead of 270W, a 30W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (60,666 vs 62,347).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8454H moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8454H

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.8% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (83 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 74F3 better than Xeon Platinum 8454H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 74F3 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8454H pulls ahead with 2.8% better PassMark. EPYC 74F3 also has the bigger cache pool with 210.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 83 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8454H is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 74F3 is the better buy right now. EPYC 74F3 comes in $5,627 cheaper on MSRP at $913 MSRP versus $6,540 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8454H is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.8% better PassMark. It is also 597.0% better value on MSRP (66.4 vs 9.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8454H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8454H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 74F3

The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

Xeon Platinum 8454H

The Xeon Platinum 8454H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 62,347 points. Launch price was $6,540.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8454H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — a 16.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 74F3 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Xeon Platinum 8454H's 62,347 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8454H. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8454H.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+33%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+210%	82.5 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	60,666	62,347+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 74F3 versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — the Xeon Platinum 8454H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 74F3) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) — the EPYC 74F3 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8454H).

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8454H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8454H rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8454H
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H came in at $6540. On launch pricing ($913 vs $6540), EPYC 74F3 was $5627 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8454H — making the EPYC 74F3 the 149.8% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP	$913-86%	$6540
Performance per Dollar	66.4+599%	9.5
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 74F3 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8454H on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.