EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon w7-3465X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 74F3

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-3465X

28 Cores56 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon w7-3465X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 74F3

24 / 48

60,666

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5900

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-3465X

28 / 56

62,663

+3.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon w7-3465X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon w7-3465X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 74F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+241.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 75 MB).
✅Costs $1,976 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Delivers 206.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 21.7 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $2,889 MSRP).
✅Draws 240W instead of 300W, a 60W reduction.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 112) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3465X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (60,666 vs 62,663).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3465X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3465X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (75 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.7 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($2,889 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
❌25% higher power demand at 300W vs 240W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3465X better than EPYC 74F3?

Yes. Xeon w7-3465X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3465X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3465X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3465X is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 74F3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-3465X comes in 216.4% more expensive on MSRP at $2,889 MSRP versus $913 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 74F3 is also 206.3% better value on MSRP (66.4 vs 21.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3465X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 28 cores / 56 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon w7-3465X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 74F3

The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

Xeon w7-3465X

The Xeon w7-3465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,663 points. Launch price was $2,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-3465X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon w7-3465X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3465X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3465X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Xeon w7-3465X's 62,663 — a 3.2% lead for the Xeon w7-3465X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon w7-3465X
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+241%	75 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	60,666	62,663+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,959
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,351

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 74F3 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3465X — the Xeon w7-3465X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 74F3) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3465X) — the EPYC 74F3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3465X).

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon w7-3465X
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+14%	112

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3465X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-3465X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 74F3) vs true (Xeon w7-3465X). Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon w7-3465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon w7-3465X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the Xeon w7-3465X came in at $2889. On launch pricing ($913 vs $2889), EPYC 74F3 was $1976 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 21.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3465X — making the EPYC 74F3 the 101.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP	$913-68%	$2889
Performance per Dollar	66.4+206%	21.7
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 74F3 on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3465X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.