EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8380

CPU

GPU

EPYC 74F3

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8380

40 Cores80 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 74F3

24 / 48

60,666

0.0%

Ryzen 9 5900

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Platinum 8380

40 / 80

62,318

+2.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 74F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
✅Costs $1,097 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Delivers 114.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Draws 240W instead of 270W, a 30W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (60,666 vs 62,318).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8380

2021

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than EPYC 74F3?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 40 cores and 80 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8380 is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 74F3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8380 comes in 120.2% more expensive on MSRP at $2,010 MSRP versus $913 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 74F3 is also 114.3% better value on MSRP (66.4 vs 31.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 40 cores / 80 threads instead of 24/48 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 74F3

The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

Xeon Platinum 8380

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 74F3 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8380
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	40 / 80+67%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+18%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+327%	60 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	60,666	62,318+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	40,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 74F3) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the EPYC 74F3 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8380
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8380 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8380
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Datacenter

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($913 vs $2010), EPYC 74F3 was $1097 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the EPYC 74F3 the 72.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 74F3	Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP	$913-55%	$2010
Performance per Dollar	66.4+114%	31.0
Release Date	2021	2021

Search EPYC 74F3 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.