Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Gold 6448Y

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 74F3

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6448Y

32 Cores64 Thrd225 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Gold 6448Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 74F3
24 / 48
60,666
+0.4%
brand logoRyzen 9 5900
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen 9 PRO 7945
brand logoRyzen 9 7940HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Xeon Gold 6448Y
32 / 64
60,449
0.0%
brand logoXeon W-2150B
brand logoCore i9-12900H
brand logoCore i7-13700E
brand logoCore i9-13900E
brand logoCore i9-14900F
brand logoXeon w7-2475X
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
brand logoXeon w9-3495X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Gold 6448Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low170 FPS
medium141 FPS
high120 FPS
ultra95 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low200 FPS
medium165 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra107 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low507 FPS
medium443 FPS
high354 FPS
ultra288 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low303 FPS
medium269 FPS
high224 FPS
ultra199 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low725 FPS
medium619 FPS
high572 FPS
ultra504 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low1025 FPS
medium1006 FPS
high929 FPS
ultra843 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low937 FPS
medium854 FPS
high731 FPS
ultra647 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low972 FPS
medium875 FPS
high756 FPS
ultra649 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra293 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low323 FPS
medium244 FPS
high213 FPS
ultra189 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low254 FPS
medium226 FPS
high178 FPS
ultra144 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low267 FPS
medium235 FPS
high185 FPS
ultra152 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low323 FPS
medium289 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra231 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low322 FPS
medium283 FPS
high260 FPS
ultra220 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 74F3
low239 FPS
medium211 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra168 FPS
1080P
Xeon Gold 6448Y
low287 FPS
medium266 FPS
high225 FPS
ultra209 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Gold 6448Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 74F3

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
  • ✅Costs $2,670 less on MSRP ($913 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 293.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
  • ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6448Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
  • ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6448Y

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 225W instead of 240W, a 15W reduction.
  • ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (60,449 vs 60,666).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6448Y better than EPYC 74F3?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6448Y is ahead with a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 74F3 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. EPYC 74F3 also has the bigger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 74F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6448Y is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 74F3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6448Y comes in 292.4% more expensive on MSRP at $3,583 MSRP versus $913 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 74F3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. EPYC 74F3 is also 293.9% better value on MSRP (66.4 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6448Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 74F3 vs Xeon Gold 6448Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 74F3

The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6448Y

The Xeon Gold 6448Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,449 points. Launch price was $3,583.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6448Y offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6448Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448Y — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6448Y (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Gold 6448Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Xeon Gold 6448Y's 60,449 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 74F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6448Y.

FeatureEPYC 74F3Xeon Gold 6448Y
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+33%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+327%
60 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
7 nm+
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
60,666
60,449
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6448Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 74F3 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6448Y — the Xeon Gold 6448Y supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 74F3) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6448Y) — the EPYC 74F3 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6448Y).

FeatureEPYC 74F3Xeon Gold 6448Y
Socket
SP3
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+60%
80
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6448Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 6448Y rivals EPYC 9354.

FeatureEPYC 74F3Xeon Gold 6448Y
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 74F3 was priced at $913, while the Xeon Gold 6448Y came in at $3583. On launch pricing ($913 vs $3583), EPYC 74F3 was $2670 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6448Y — making the EPYC 74F3 the 119% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 74F3Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP
$913-75%
$3583
Performance per Dollar
66.4+293%
16.9
Release Date
2021
2023
Search EPYC 74F3 on AmazonSearch Xeon Gold 6448Y on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.