EPYC 7473X vs Xeon W-3375

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7473X

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3375

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon W-3375 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7473X

24 / 48

59,280

+0.3%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon W-3375

38 / 76

59,091

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7473X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,051 less on MSRP ($3,900 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 240W instead of 270W, a 30W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7473X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (59,091 vs 59,280).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7473X better than Xeon W-3375?

Yes. EPYC 7473X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7473X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 768 MB versus 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7473X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1247.4% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7473X is the better buy right now. EPYC 7473X comes in $1,051 cheaper on MSRP at $3,900 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 27.4% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7473X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 768 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 38/76. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7473X vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7473X

The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7473X packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3375 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7473X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7473X scores 59,280 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+12%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+1247%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	59,280	59,091
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,713

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7473X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7473X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the EPYC 7473X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7473X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon W-3375
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7473X) vs true (Xeon W-3375). Direct competitor: EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7473X was priced at $3900, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($3900 vs $4951), EPYC 7473X was $1051 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7473X delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the EPYC 7473X the 24.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7473X	Xeon W-3375
MSRP	$3900-21%	$4951
Performance per Dollar	15.2+28%	11.9
Release Date	2022	2021

Search EPYC 7473X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.