
Core Ultra 7 265KF vs EPYC 7473X

Core Ultra 7 265KF

EPYC 7473X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265KF
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7473X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($323) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan-X (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+63%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($323) | ✅ More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 7473X

Core Ultra 7 265KF
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,690 points. Launch price was $379.

EPYC 7473X
The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265KF packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7473X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7473X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265KF versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7473X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265KF scores 58,690 against the EPYC 7473X's 59,280 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265KF vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 24 / 48+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+49% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+39% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+2460% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Milan-X (2022) |
| PassMark | 58,690 | 59,280+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,315 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,055 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,373 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7473X uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265KF versus 3200 on the EPYC 7473X — the EPYC 7473X supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7473X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) vs 8 (EPYC 7473X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) vs 128 (EPYC 7473X) — the EPYC 7473X offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z890 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) and SP3 (EPYC 7473X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4915100% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 265KF) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7473X). Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265KF rivals Ryzen 7 9700X; EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265KF launched at $379 MSRP, while the EPYC 7473X debuted at $3900. At current prices ($323 vs $200), the EPYC 7473X is $123 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers 181.7 pts/$ vs 296.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7473X — making the EPYC 7473X the 48% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-90% | $3900 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $323 | $200-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 181.7 | 296.4+63% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















