Core Ultra 7 265KF
EPYC 4584PX
Core Ultra 7 265KF vs EPYC 4584PX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 265KF vs EPYC 4584PX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 265KF vs EPYC 4584PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,138 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 290.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 154.9 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,690 vs 60,169).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4584PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4584PX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core Ultra 7 265KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 154.9 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Core Ultra 7 265KF?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 265KF vs EPYC 4584PX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 265KF
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,690 points. Launch price was $379.
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265KF packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 4584PX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265KF has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265KF versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX — a 3.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 4584PX (base: 3.9 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 4584PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265KF scores 58,690 against the EPYC 4584PX's 60,169 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 4584PX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265KF vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.2 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 58,690 | 60,169+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,315 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,055 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,373 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4584PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265KF versus 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX — the Core Ultra 7 265KF supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4584PX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) vs 28 (EPYC 4584PX) — the EPYC 4584PX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z890 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) and AM5 (EPYC 4584PX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+23% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 265KF) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX). The EPYC 4584PX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265KF rivals Ryzen 7 9700X; EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 7 265KF was priced at $379, while the EPYC 4584PX came in at $1517. On launch pricing ($379 vs $1517), Core Ultra 7 265KF was $1138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers 154.9 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 4584PX — making the Core Ultra 7 265KF the 118.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265KF | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-75% | $1517 |
| Performance per Dollar | 154.9+290% | 39.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 4584PX
