Xeon L5410
VS
Celeron G3900TE

Xeon L5410 vs Celeron G3900TE

Intel

Xeon L5410

4 Cores4 Thrd50 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5410 is positioned at rank 890 and the Celeron G3900TE is on rank 467, so the Celeron G3900TE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5410

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
22419%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4233%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3761%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2905%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
100%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
99%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
98%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
98%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
97%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
96%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
92%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
91%
#890
Xeon L5410
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
99%
#898
Xeon W-2225
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $150
96%
#900
Xeon E5-2650L v3
MSRP: $1329|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900TE

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7076%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6686%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4855%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1463%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1159%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1013%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
580%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
573%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
522%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
522%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
516%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
502%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
495%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
493%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
488%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
100%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
100%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
99%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
98%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
98%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
98%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
97%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
100%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
99%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
98%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3900TE (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon L5410Celeron G3900TE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon L5410 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and **DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon L5410Celeron G3900TE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5410 and Celeron G3900TE

Intel

Xeon L5410

The Xeon L5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 March 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,853 points. Launch price was $320.

Intel

Celeron G3900TE

The Celeron G3900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,850 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Xeon L5410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900TE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon L5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.33 GHz on the Xeon L5410 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron G3900TE — a 149.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900TE. The Xeon L5410 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3900TE uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5410 scores 1,853 against the Celeron G3900TE's 1,850 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon L5410. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5410 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900TE.

FeatureXeon L5410Celeron G3900TE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.33 GHz
2.3 GHz+597%
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+500%
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Harpertown (2007−2008)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,853
1,850
Geekbench 6 Single
514
Geekbench 6 Multi
903
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5410 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3900TE uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5410Celeron G3900TE
Socket
LGA771
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L5410) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3900TE). The Celeron G3900TE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon L5410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900TE targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900TE rivals Pentium G4400T.

FeatureXeon L5410Celeron G3900TE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded