Xeon L5410
VS
Core Duo T2700

Xeon L5410 vs Core Duo T2700

Intel

Xeon L5410

4 Cores4 Thrd50 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2700

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5410 is positioned at rank 890 and the Core Duo T2700 is on rank 1233, so the Xeon L5410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5410

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
22419%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4233%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3761%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2905%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
100%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
99%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
98%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
98%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
97%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
96%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
92%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
91%
#890
Xeon L5410
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
99%
#898
Xeon W-2225
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $150
96%
#900
Xeon E5-2650L v3
MSRP: $1329|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2700

#1221
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
10441%
#1222
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
10288%
#1223
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
9445%
#1224
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
9402%
#1225
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
9316%
#1227
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
8996%
#1228
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
8626%
#1229
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
8612%
#1230
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
8381%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
100%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
84%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
76%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
74%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
72%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
65%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
60%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5410 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon L5410Core Duo T2700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($663)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2700 ($663), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($663 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon L5410Core Duo T2700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($663)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5410 and Core Duo T2700

Intel

Xeon L5410

The Xeon L5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 March 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,853 points. Launch price was $320.

Intel

Core Duo T2700

The Core Duo T2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,860 points. Launch price was $663.

Processing Power

The Xeon L5410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon L5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.33 GHz on the Xeon L5410 versus 2.33 GHz on the Core Duo T2700 — a 150.4% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2700 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Xeon L5410 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Duo T2700 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5410 scores 1,853 against the Core Duo T2700's 1,860 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Duo T2700. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L5410 vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2700.

FeatureXeon L5410Core Duo T2700
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.33 GHz
2.33 GHz+606%
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
2.33 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Harpertown (2007−2008)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,853
1,860
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5410 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5410Core Duo T2700
Socket
LGA771
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L5410) / VT-x (Core Duo T2700). Primary use case: Core Duo T2700 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2700 rivals Core 2 Duo T5600.

FeatureXeon L5410Core Duo T2700
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop