Xeon Phi 7290
VS
EPYC 7232P

Xeon Phi 7290 vs EPYC 7232P

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016
VS
AMD

EPYC 7232P

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Phi 7290

#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
103%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
103%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#113
Xeon Phi 7290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7232P

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#116
EPYC 7232P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
99%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 7232P (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Phi 7290EPYC 7232P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Knights Landing (2016) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Phi 7290 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Phi 7290EPYC 7232P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7232P

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

The Xeon Phi 7290 packs 72 cores / 288 threads, while the EPYC 7232P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P — a 61.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7232P (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon Phi 7290 uses the Knights Landing (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7232P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Phi 7290 scores 17,839 against the EPYC 7232P's 17,712 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290 vs 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P.

FeatureXeon Phi 7290EPYC 7232P
Cores / Threads
72 / 288+800%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+88%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.1 GHz+107%
L3 Cache
0 kB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
Architecture
Knights Landing (2016)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
17,839
17,712
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Phi 7290 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7232P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Phi 7290EPYC 7232P
Socket
LGA3647
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%