Xeon Phi 7290 vs Xeon W-1270P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Phi 7290 vs Xeon W-1270P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Phi 7290 vs Xeon W-1270P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1270P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 17,961).
❌96% higher power demand at 245W vs 125W.

Xeon W-1270P

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 245W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1270P better than Xeon Phi 7290?

Yes. Xeon W-1270P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 29.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1270P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 29.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1270P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1270P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon W-1270P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1270P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 72/288. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Phi 7290 vs Xeon W-1270P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-1270P

The Xeon W-1270P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 17,961 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Phi 7290 packs 72 cores / 288 threads, while the Xeon W-1270P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1270P — a 100% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1270P (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon Phi 7290 is built on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Phi 7290 scores 17,839 against the Xeon W-1270P's 17,961 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-1270P. L3 cache: 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290 vs 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1270P.

Feature	Xeon Phi 7290	Xeon W-1270P
Cores / Threads	72 / 288+800%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	5.1 GHz+200%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+153%
L3 Cache	0 kB (total)	16 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Knights Landing (2016)	—
PassMark	17,839	17,961

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Phi 7290 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1270P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.