Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Phi 7290

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Phi 7290 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 4800HS

8 / 16

18,016

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Phi 7290

72 / 288

17,839

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Phi 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Phi 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 245W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 4800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 18,016).
❌600% higher power demand at 245W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 4800HS better than Xeon Phi 7290?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4800HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 4800HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 4800HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 4800HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 4800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 72/288. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Phi 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 4800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 84.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4800HS (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4800HS scores 18,016 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 4800HS. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

Feature	Ryzen 7 4800HS	Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	72 / 288+800%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+147%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+93%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	18,016	17,839

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.