Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 7 4800HS

Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 7 4800HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-9900KF

8 / 16

18,029

+0.1%

18,016

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 7 4800HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 7 4800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9900KF

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,016 vs 18,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9900KF better than Ryzen 7 4800HS?

Yes. Core i9-9900KF is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 30.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-9900KF is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 30.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9900KF is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-9900KF is the better buy right now. Core i9-9900KF comes in at an unclear MSRP at $488 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 30.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-9900KF vs Ryzen 7 4800HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9900KF

The Core i9-9900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,029 points. Launch price was $488.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-9900KF and Ryzen 7 4800HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KF versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KF (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i9-9900KF uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900KF scores 18,029 against the Ryzen 7 4800HS's 18,016 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-9900KF. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KF vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS.

Feature	Core i9-9900KF	Ryzen 7 4800HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+19%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+24%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+100%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	18,029	18,016
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,812	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,720	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,150	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9900KF uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.