
Core i5-11600

Core i9-9900KF
Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-9900KF Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-9900KF FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-9900KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11600
2021Why buy it
- β Costs $275 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- β Delivers 127.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.1 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Core i9-9900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,500 vs 12,812).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Core i9-9900KF
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 84.1 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- β46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900KF better than Core i5-11600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-9900KF Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600
The Core i5-11600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,912 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i9-9900KF
The Core i9-9900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,029 points. Launch price was $488.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-9900KF offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Core i9-9900KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-11600 versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KF β a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KF (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-11600 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-9900KF uses Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600 scores 17,912 against the Core i9-9900KF's 18,029 β a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-9900KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 10,500 vs 12,812 (19.8% advantage for the Core i9-9900KF). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,130 vs 1,720, a 21.3% lead for the Core i5-11600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,000 vs 8,150 (1.9% advantage for the Core i9-9900KF). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KF.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 17,912 | 18,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,500 | 12,812+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,130+24% | 1,720 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,000 | 8,150+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-9900KF uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11600 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9900KF β the Core i5-11600 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11600) vs 16 (Core i9-9900KF) β the Core i5-11600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-11600) and Z390,Z370,H370,B365,B360 (Core i9-9900KF).
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9900KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-11600 supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i5-11600 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Core i9-9900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600 targets Gaming, Core i9-9900KF targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11600 was priced at $213, while the Core i9-9900KF came in at $488. On launch pricing ($213 vs $488), Core i5-11600 was $275 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600 delivers 84.1 pts/$ vs 36.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-9900KF β making the Core i5-11600 the 77.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $213-56% | $488 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.1+128% | 36.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














