
Core i5-11600

Core Ultra 7 255U
Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 255U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 255U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 255U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11600
2021Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Core Ultra 7 255U needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 7 255U.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β364.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 14W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 255U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 255U
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 14W instead of 65W, a 51W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (17,834 vs 17,912).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255U better than Core i5-11600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 255U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600
The Core i5-11600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,912 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 7 255U
The Core Ultra 7 255U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MBΒ +Β 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,834 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 255U offers 12 cores / 14 threads β the Core Ultra 7 255U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-11600 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255U β a 8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-11600 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 255U uses Arrow Lake-U (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600 scores 17,912 against the Core Ultra 7 255U's 17,834 β a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-11600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600 vs 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255U.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core Ultra 7 255U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 14+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | β |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Arrow Lake-U (2025) |
| PassMark | 17,912 | 17,834 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,500 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,130 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,000 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 255U uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core Ultra 7 255U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600) / not specified (Core Ultra 7 255U). The Core i5-11600 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Core Ultra 7 255U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Core Ultra 7 255U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













