
Core i5-11600

Xeon Phi 7290
Core i5-11600 vs Xeon Phi 7290 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11600 vs Xeon Phi 7290 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11600 vs Xeon Phi 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Xeon Phi 7290 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Phi 7290.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 17,912).
- ❌276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11600.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11600 better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11600 vs Xeon Phi 7290 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600
The Core i5-11600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 17,912 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Phi 7290
The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-11600 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 95.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i5-11600 uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600 scores 17,912 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-11600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 72 / 288+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+182% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+87% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| PassMark | 17,912 | 17,839 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). The Core i5-11600 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Xeon Phi 7290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600 rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-11600 | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













