
Core i9-9900KF

Xeon W-2145
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon W-2145 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon W-2145 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon W-2145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9900KF
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $625 less on MSRP ($488 MSRP vs $1,113 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.9 vs 16.2 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $1,113 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2145, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2145
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,024 vs 18,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.2 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($1,113 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900KF better than Xeon W-2145?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9900KF vs Xeon W-2145 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9900KF
The Core i9-9900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,029 points. Launch price was $488.

Xeon W-2145
The Xeon W-2145 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,024 points. Launch price was $1,113.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-9900KF and Xeon W-2145 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KF versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2145 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KF (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-9900KF uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2145 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900KF scores 18,029 against the Xeon W-2145's 18,024 — a 0% lead for the Core i9-9900KF. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KF vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2145.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KF | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+11% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+45% | 11 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 18,029 | 18,024 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,812 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,720 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,150 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900KF uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2145 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon W-2145 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-9900KF) vs 4 (Xeon W-2145). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-9900KF) vs 48 (Xeon W-2145) — the Xeon W-2145 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z390,Z370,H370,B365,B360 (Core i9-9900KF) and Intel X299,Intel C422 (Xeon W-2145).
| Feature | Core i9-9900KF | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900KF) / not specified (Xeon W-2145). Primary use case: Core i9-9900KF targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KF | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9900KF was priced at $488, while the Xeon W-2145 came in at $1113. On launch pricing ($488 vs $1113), Core i9-9900KF was $625 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900KF delivers 36.9 pts/$ vs 16.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2145 — making the Core i9-9900KF the 78.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KF | Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $488-56% | $1113 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.9+128% | 16.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














