Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon D-2187NT

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon D-2187NT Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 4800HS

8 / 16

18,016

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-2187NT

16 / 32

18,070

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon D-2187NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon D-2187NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,016 vs 18,070).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2187NT, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon D-2187NT

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+175% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 4800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 4800HS better than Xeon D-2187NT?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2187NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4800HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2187NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 175% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 4800HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 4800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon D-2187NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2187NT

The Xeon D-2187NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,070 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 4800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2187NT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2187NT has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2187NT — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4800HS (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon D-2187NT uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4800HS scores 18,016 against the Xeon D-2187NT's 18,070 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon D-2187NT. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS vs 22 MB on the Xeon D-2187NT.

Feature	Ryzen 7 4800HS	Xeon D-2187NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+40%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	22 MB+175%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	16 MB+3100%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	18,016	18,070

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2187NT uses FCBGA2518 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.