Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Gold 6144

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Gold 6144 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 4800HS

8 / 16

18,016

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6144

8 / 16

18,040

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Gold 6144 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Gold 6144: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6144 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,016 vs 18,040).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6144

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+209.4% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6144 better than Ryzen 7 4800HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6144 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4800HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6144 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6144 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 209.4% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6144 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6144 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Xeon Gold 6144 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6144

The Xeon Gold 6144 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,040 points. Launch price was $2,925.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 4800HS and Xeon Gold 6144 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6144 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6144 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 4800HS scores 18,016 against the Xeon Gold 6144's 18,040 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6144. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6144.

Feature	Ryzen 7 4800HS	Xeon Gold 6144
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	24.75 MB+209%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	8 MB+1500%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	18,016	18,040

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 4800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6144 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.