EPYC 7232P
VS
Xeon Phi 7290

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

EPYC 7232P

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7232P

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#116
EPYC 7232P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
99%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Phi 7290

#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
103%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
103%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#113
Xeon Phi 7290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 7232P (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7232PXeon Phi 7290
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Knights Landing (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Phi 7290 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7232PXeon Phi 7290
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7232P and Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7232P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 61.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7232P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The EPYC 7232P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7232P scores 17,712 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureEPYC 7232PXeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
72 / 288+800%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+88%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+107%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
17,712
17,839
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7232P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7232PXeon Phi 7290
Socket
SP3
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0