EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Phi 7290

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Phi 7290 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7232P

8 / 16

17,712

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Phi 7290

72 / 288

17,839

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Phi 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Phi 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7232P

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 120W instead of 245W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Phi 7290 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,712 vs 17,839).

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌104.2% higher power demand at 245W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Phi 7290 better than EPYC 7232P?

Yes. Xeon Phi 7290 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Phi 7290 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7290 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 288 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Phi 7290 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Phi 7290 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7232P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon Phi 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7232P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 61.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7232P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The EPYC 7232P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7232P scores 17,712 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

Feature	EPYC 7232P	Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	72 / 288+800%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+88%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+107%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	17,712	17,839

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7232P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.