EPYC 7232P vs Xeon E5-2687W v4

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7232P

8 / 16

17,712

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2687W v4

12 / 24

17,640

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon E5-2687W v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7232P

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-2687W v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,640 vs 17,712).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while EPYC 7232P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7232P better than Xeon E5-2687W v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2687W v4 is ahead with a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7232P pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2687W v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7232P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7232P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2687W v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7232P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2687W v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2687W v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7232P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7232P vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon E5-2687W v4

The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,640 points. Launch price was $2,141.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7232P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — a 9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2687W v4 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7232P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7232P scores 17,712 against the Xeon E5-2687W v4's 17,640 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7232P. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2687W v4.

Feature	EPYC 7232P	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+3%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB+88%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	3 MB+500%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,712	17,640
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,063
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,255

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7232P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7232P	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Socket	SP3	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40