EPYC 7232P vs Ryzen 7 4800HS

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7232P vs Ryzen 7 4800HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7232P vs Ryzen 7 4800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7232P

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 4800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,712 vs 18,016).
❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 4800HS better than EPYC 7232P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7232P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 4800HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 4800HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 4800HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 4800HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 4800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 4800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7232P vs Ryzen 7 4800HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Ryzen 7 4800HS

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7232P and Ryzen 7 4800HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4800HS (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 7232P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7232P scores 17,712 against the Ryzen 7 4800HS's 18,016 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 4800HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS.

Feature	EPYC 7232P	Ryzen 7 4800HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.2 GHz+31%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+7%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+100%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	17,712	18,016+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7232P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.