Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon Phi 7290

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon Phi 7290 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 7535HS

6 / 12

17,820

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Phi 7290

72 / 288

17,839

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon Phi 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon Phi 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7535HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 245W, a 210W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,820 vs 17,839).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 245W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7535HS better than Xeon Phi 7290?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7535HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7290 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 288 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7535HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 7535HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7535HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon Phi 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 7535HS

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 17,820 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7535HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 66 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535HS versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 91.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 17,820 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535HS vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7535HS	Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	72 / 288+1100%
Boost Clock	4.55 GHz+168%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+120%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	17,820	17,839

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.