Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E5-2687W v4

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 7535HS

6 / 12

17,820

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2687W v4

12 / 24

17,640

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E5-2687W v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7535HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2687W v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,640 vs 17,820).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7535HS better than Xeon E5-2687W v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2687W v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7535HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7535HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7535HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2687W v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 7535HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2687W v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2687W v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7535HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Xeon E5-2687W v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 7535HS

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 17,820 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2687W v4

The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,640 points. Launch price was $2,141.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7535HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535HS versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 17,820 against the Xeon E5-2687W v4's 17,640 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7535HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535HS vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2687W v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7535HS	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.55 GHz+30%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+16967%	3 MB
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,820+1%	17,640
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,063
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,255

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7535HS	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Socket	FP7	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40