Core 3 100HL vs Ryzen 5 7535HS

Intel

Core 3 100HL

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 7535HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.55 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

Core 3 100HL vs Ryzen 5 7535HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 100HL vs Ryzen 5 7535HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 100HL vs Ryzen 5 7535HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 17,820).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $306 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7535HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 7535HS

2023

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 3 100HL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 100HL better than Ryzen 5 7535HS?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 3 100HL is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7535HS pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 7535HS also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7535HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 3 100HL is the better buy right now. Core 3 100HL comes in at an unclear MSRP at $306 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 7535HS is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 3 100HL vs Ryzen 5 7535HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7535HS

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 17,820 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7535HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535HS — a 1.1% clock advantage for the Core 3 100HL (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7535HS uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Ryzen 5 7535HS's 17,820 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 7535HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535HS.

FeatureCore 3 100HLRyzen 5 7535HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 12+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+1%
4.55 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz+57%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+25500%
Process
10 nm
6 nm-40%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
17,586
17,820+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7535HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 100HLRyzen 5 7535HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0