Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-4669 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,701 less on MSRP ($306 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2195.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 57.5 vs 2.5 PassMark/$ ($306 MSRP vs $7,007 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4669 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+358.3% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,547 vs 17,586).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($7,007 MSRP vs $306 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 3 100HL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 100HL better than Xeon E5-4669 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4669 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 3 100HL is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 3 100HL is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 100HL is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 3 100HL is the better buy right now. Core 3 100HL comes in $6,701 cheaper on MSRP at $306 MSRP versus $7,007 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2195.0% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 2.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 12 threads instead of 22/44. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon E5-4669 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4669 v4

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,547 points. Launch price was $7,007.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core 3 100HL (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 3 100HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Xeon E5-4669 v4's 17,547 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 3 100HL. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-4669 v4.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon E5-4669 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+53%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	55 MB+358%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+175%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,586	17,547
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,730
Geekbench 6 Single	—	825
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,882

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon E5-4669 v4
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 100HL) / Yes (Xeon E5-4669 v4).

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon E5-4669 v4
Integrated GPU	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 3 100HL was priced at $306, while the Xeon E5-4669 v4 came in at $7007. On launch pricing ($306 vs $7007), Core 3 100HL was $6701 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 100HL delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 2.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4669 v4 — making the Core 3 100HL the 183.3% better value option.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP	$306-96%	$7007
Performance per Dollar	57.5+2200%	2.5
Release Date	2024	2016

Search Core 3 100HL on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4669 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.