Core 3 100HL vs Xeon D-1736NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon D-1736NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon D-1736NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 100HL

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 67W, a 22W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,586 vs 17,826).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $306 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 3 100HL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌48.9% higher power demand at 67W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core 3 100HL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 100HL better than Xeon D-1736NT?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1736NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 3 100HL is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1736NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 3 100HL is the better buy right now. Core 3 100HL comes in at an unclear MSRP at $306 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon D-1736NT is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.4% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (57.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 3 100HL vs Xeon D-1736NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 100HL

The Core 3 100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,586 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 100HL packs 8 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon D-1736NT's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core 3 100HL versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Core 3 100HL (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core 3 100HL is built on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 3 100HL scores 17,586 against the Xeon D-1736NT's 17,826 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon D-1736NT. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 3 100HL vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT.

Feature	Core 3 100HL	Xeon D-1736NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+31%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.7 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-PS (2024)	—
PassMark	17,586	17,826+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100HL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-1736NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.