Xeon Platinum 8180M
VS
EPYC 9015

Xeon Platinum 8180M vs EPYC 9015

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180M

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
VS
AMD

EPYC 9015

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8180M

#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
103%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
100%
#170
Xeon Platinum 8180M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
99%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
97%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9015

#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
107%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
105%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
105%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
104%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
103%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
103%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
102%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
102%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
101%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
101%
#246
EPYC 9015
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
97%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
97%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
97%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
97%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
97%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
94%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
94%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
93%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
92%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
91%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 9015 (2024) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Platinum 8180MEPYC 9015
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8180M (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Platinum 8180MEPYC 9015
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8180M and EPYC 9015

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180M

The Xeon Platinum 8180M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 30,313 points. Launch price was $13,011.

AMD

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8180M packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC 9015 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180M has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180M versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 — a 7.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 9015 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8180M uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 9015 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 30,313 against the EPYC 9015's 30,505 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 9015. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 25,000 vs 15,000 (50% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,000 vs 1,400, a 33.3% lead for the EPYC 9015 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 21,854 vs 11,000 (66.1% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180M). L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180M vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8180MEPYC 9015
Cores / Threads
28 / 56+250%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
38.5 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+66%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
30,313
30,505
Cinebench R23 Multi
25,000+67%
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
1,400+40%
Geekbench 6 Multi
21,854+99%
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8180M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 9015 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180M versus DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 — the EPYC 9015 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) vs 12 (EPYC 9015). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) vs 128 (EPYC 9015) — the EPYC 9015 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) and SP5 platform (EPYC 9015).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8180MEPYC 9015
Socket
LGA3647
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-6000+25%
Max RAM Capacity
1536 GB
4096 GB+167%
RAM Channels
6
12+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
128+167%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8180M) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8180M targets Mission Critical Datacenter, EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8180M rivals EPYC 7551; EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8180MEPYC 9015
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
Mission Critical Datacenter
Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads