Xeon Platinum 8268
VS
Core Ultra 7 265H

Xeon Platinum 8268 vs Core Ultra 7 265H

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 265H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8268

#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
143%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
111%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
110%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
101%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
100%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
114%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
107%
#56
Core Ultra 7 265H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 265H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Platinum 8268Core Ultra 7 265H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($6,302)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8268 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Platinum 8268Core Ultra 7 265H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($6,302)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8268 and Core Ultra 7 265H

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265H

The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8268 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H — a 30.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8268 uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8268 scores 35,081 against the Core Ultra 7 265H's 34,702 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8268. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268 vs 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8268Core Ultra 7 265H
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 16
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
5.3 GHz+36%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
4.5 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
35.75 MB (total)+49%
24 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
5 nm-64%
Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
35,081+1%
34,702
Cinebench R23 Multi
24,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,394
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,046
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8268 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 versus 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265H). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) — the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268) and BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8268Core Ultra 7 265H
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
8400+209900%
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB+838860700%
128
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+71%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H). The Core Ultra 7 265H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T GPU), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452; Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8268Core Ultra 7 265H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-end Server