Xeon Silver 4112 vs Core i7-970
Xeon Silver 4112
Core i7-970
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Silver 4112 is positioned at rank 933 and the Core i7-970 is on rank 1063, so the Xeon Silver 4112 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4112
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-970
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Silver 4112 | Core i7-970 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($67) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($289) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Silver 4112 | Core i7-970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+331%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($67) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($289) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Silver 4112 and Core i7-970
Xeon Silver 4112
The Xeon Silver 4112 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,536 points. Launch price was $473.
Core i7-970
The Core i7-970 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,547 points. Launch price was $662.
Processing Power
The Xeon Silver 4112 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-970 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-970 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4112 versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-970 — a 14.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-970 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4112 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-970 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4112 scores 6,536 against the Core i7-970's 6,547 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-970. L3 cache: 8.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4112 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-970.
| Feature | Xeon Silver 4112 | Core i7-970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.46 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 8.25 MB | 12 MB (total)+45% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 6,536 | 6,547 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Silver 4112 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-970 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Silver 4112 | Core i7-970 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 24 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 3 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 36 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Silver 4112) / VT-x (Core i7-970). Primary use case: Core i7-970 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Xeon Silver 4112 | Core i7-970 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Silver 4112 launched at $885 MSRP, while the Core i7-970 debuted at $1083. At current prices ($67 vs $289), the Xeon Silver 4112 is $222 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Silver 4112 delivers 97.6 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-970 — making the Xeon Silver 4112 the 124.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Silver 4112 | Core i7-970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $885-18% | $1083 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $67-77% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.6+330% | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Silver 4112 and Core i7-970
