Xeon Silver 4215
VS
Opteron 6278

Xeon Silver 4215 vs Opteron 6278

Intel

Xeon Silver 4215

8 Cores16 Thrd85 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Opteron 6278

16 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4215

#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
103%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
103%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
100%
#198
Xeon Silver 4215
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#201
Xeon Gold 6248R
MSRP: $2700|Avg: N/A
100%
#210
EPYC 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6278

#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
104%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
103%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
103%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
100%
#197
Opteron 6278
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#201
Xeon Gold 6248R
MSRP: $2700|Avg: N/A
100%
#210
EPYC 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon Silver 4215 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Silver 4215Opteron 6278
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 6278 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Silver 4215Opteron 6278
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Silver 4215 and Opteron 6278

Intel

Xeon Silver 4215

The Xeon Silver 4215 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,728 points. Launch price was $794.

AMD

Opteron 6278

The Opteron 6278 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,733 points. Launch price was $988.

Processing Power

The Xeon Silver 4215 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Opteron 6278 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6278 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4215 versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6278 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4215 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4215 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6278 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4215 scores 13,728 against the Opteron 6278's 13,733 — a 0% lead for the Opteron 6278. L3 cache: 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4215 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6278.

FeatureXeon Silver 4215Opteron 6278
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+4%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
11 MB+38%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB (per module)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark
13,728
13,733
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Silver 4215 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6278 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Silver 4215Opteron 6278
Socket
LGA3647
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0