Xeon W-10855M vs Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Xeon W-10855M
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon W-10855M is positioned at rank #82 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-10855M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-10855M | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($43) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-H (2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-10855M | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+42%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($43) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-10855M and Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
The Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,155 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-10855M packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W-10855M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W-10855M uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-10855M scores 12,249 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 210's 12,155 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-10855M. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 210.
| Feature | Xeon W-10855M | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 12,249 | 12,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-10855M uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W-10855M | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-10855M launched at $118 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 debuted at $0. At current prices ($43 vs $30), the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is $13 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-10855M delivers 284.9 pts/$ vs 405.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 210 the 34.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-10855M | Ryzen 3 PRO 210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $118 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $43 | $30-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 284.9 | 405.2+42% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-10855M and Ryzen 3 PRO 210
