Xeon W-2295
VS
Core Ultra 7 255H

Xeon W-2295 vs Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel

Xeon W-2295

18 Cores36 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

16 Cores16 Thrd26 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-2295

#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
107%
#337
EPYC 7F72
MSRP: $2131|Avg: $2131
107%
#338
Xeon W-2265
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $663
106%
#339
Xeon w7-3555
MSRP: $2749|Avg: $2199
106%
#340
Xeon w7-3445
MSRP: $1989|Avg: $2596
106%
#341
EPYC 9275F
MSRP: $3439|Avg: $3439
106%
#342
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
MSRP: $3899|Avg: $3971.7
106%
#343
EPYC 7543P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $115
105%
#344
EPYC 9455P
MSRP: $4819|Avg: $4366
104%
#345
EPYC 9274F
MSRP: $3060|Avg: $2490
104%
#346
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
MSRP: $2607|Avg: $389
103%
#348
Xeon Gold 6426Y
MSRP: $2145|Avg: N/A
101%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
101%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
100%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
98%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
97%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
96%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
95%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
94%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
94%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
93%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
93%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
93%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
92%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
92%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
92%
#364
Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1834
91%
#365
EPYC 7513
MSRP: $2840|Avg: $389
90%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 255H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
112%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
110%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
106%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
104%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
102%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
102%
#181
Core Ultra 7 255H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
98%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
90%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 255H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon W-2295Core Ultra 7 255H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,400)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W-2295 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon W-2295Core Ultra 7 255H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,400)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-2295 and Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel

Xeon W-2295

The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255H

The Core Ultra 7 255H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,932 points. Launch price was $514.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-2295 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 255H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255H — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H (base: 3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255H is built on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W-2295 scores 30,986 against the Core Ultra 7 255H's 30,932 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-2295. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,703 vs 2,800, a 48.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,863 vs 15,700 (19.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255H). L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295 vs 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 255H.

FeatureXeon W-2295Core Ultra 7 255H
Cores / Threads
18 / 36+13%
16 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5.1 GHz+6%
Base Clock
3 GHz
4.4 GHz+47%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB+3%
24 MB
Process
14 nm
5 nm-64%
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
30,986
30,932
Geekbench 6 Single
1,703
2,800+64%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,863
15,700+22%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-2295 uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 255H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2295 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255H — the Core Ultra 7 255H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2295 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon W-2295) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 255H). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon W-2295) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 255H) — the Xeon W-2295 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C422 (Xeon W-2295) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255H).

FeatureXeon W-2295Core Ultra 7 255H
Socket
LGA2066
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB+700%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+71%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2295 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 255H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 140T), while the Xeon W-2295 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation, Core Ultra 7 255H targets High-End Laptop.

FeatureXeon W-2295Core Ultra 7 255H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation
High-End Laptop