
Xeon W-2295

Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-2295 vs Xeon W-3245 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon W-2295 vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon W-2295 vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon W-2295
2019Why buy it
- ✅+25.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $866 less on MSRP ($1,333 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.2 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon W-3245
2019Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,353 vs 1,703).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,698 vs 12,863).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2295 better than Xeon W-3245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-2295 vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W-2295
The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3245
The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-2295 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2295 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon W-3245 is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W-2295 scores 30,986 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-3245. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,703 vs 1,353, a 22.9% lead for the Xeon W-2295 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,863 vs 11,698 (9.5% advantage for the Xeon W-2295). L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295 vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.
| Feature | Xeon W-2295 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+13% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+4% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB+13% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,986 | 31,089 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,703+26% | 1,353 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,863+10% | 11,698 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-2295 uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 1024 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon W-2295) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon W-2295) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C422 (Xeon W-2295) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).
| Feature | Xeon W-2295 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). Primary use case: Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Xeon W-2295 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Workstation | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon W-2295 was priced at $1333, while the Xeon W-3245 came in at $2199. On launch pricing ($1333 vs $2199), Xeon W-2295 was $866 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-2295 delivers 23.2 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245 — making the Xeon W-2295 the 48.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-2295 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1333-39% | $2199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.2+65% | 14.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















