Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-2295

AMD

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024
Ryzen family
······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-2295

18 Cores36 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-2295 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-2295 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-2295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $1,063 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
  • Delivers 397.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

  • +54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,863 vs 13,500).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
  • 153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8700F moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Xeon W-2295?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2295 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8700F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8700F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8700F is the stronger fit. You are getting 5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 8700F is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 8700F comes in $1,063 cheaper on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $1,333 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 397.8% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 23.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 8700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 8700F vs Xeon W-2295 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

Intel

Xeon W-2295

The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8700F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2295 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8700F is built on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8700F scores 31,240 against the Xeon W-2295's 30,986 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,649 vs 1,703, a 43.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,500 vs 12,863 (4.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295.

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FXeon W-2295
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+4%
4.8 GHz
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+37%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
31,240
30,986
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,040
Geekbench 6 Single
2,649+56%
1,703
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,500+5%
12,863
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2295 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2295 — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2295 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 4 (Xeon W-2295). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs 48 (Xeon W-2295) — the Xeon W-2295 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F) and C422 (Xeon W-2295).

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FXeon W-2295
Socket
AM5
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200+77%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
48+140%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU, Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FXeon W-2295
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 8700F was priced at $270, while the Xeon W-2295 came in at $1333. On launch pricing ($270 vs $1333), Ryzen 7 8700F was $1063 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 8700F delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2295 — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 133.1% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 8700FXeon W-2295
MSRP
$270-80%
$1333
Performance per Dollar
115.7+399%
23.2
Release Date
2024
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.